Home 5 News 5 Moors Murders: Judge rules on Ian Brady body disposal

Moors Murders: Judge rules on Ian Brady body disposal

Moors Murderer Ian Brady’s remains must be disposed of with “no music and no ceremony”, a High Court judge has ruled.

Two councils asked the judge to step in to ensure the disposal of the serial killer’s body did not cause “offence and distress” to his victims’ families.

Sir Geoffrey Vos said Brady’s executor had failed to make proper arrangements for disposal of his remains.

Brady died aged 79, on 15 May, but his remains have not yet been disposed of.

Brady and Myra Hindley, who died in prison in 2002, tortured and murdered five children in the 1960s.

Referring to Brady’s remains, Sir Geoffrey ruled there should be “no music or ceremony” at the disposal, specifically banning the fifth movement of the Symphony Fantastique by Berlioz.

He acted after Oldham and Tameside councils raised concerned that five months after Brady’s death his executor, solicitor Robin Makin, had failed to make proper arrangements for the disposal of his remains.

As part of his ruling, Sir Geoffrey accepted a proposal for a Tameside council officer to arrange for the disposal was the “best available”.

“I am satisfied also that it is both necessary and expedient for the matter to be taken out of Mr Makin’s hands,” Sir Geoffrey said.

‘Legitimate offence’

“Even after a hearing that has lasted for one and a half days, the parties have not been able to agree precisely how the deceased’s body should be disposed of.”

In issuing directions about the body’s disposal, Sir Geoffrey said: “I decline to permit the playing of the fifth movement of the Symphony Fantastique at the cremation, as Mr Makin requested.”

He cited programme notes for the piece that state the composer sees himself “at a witches’ sabbath, in the midst of a hideous gathering of shades, sorcerers and monsters of every kind who have come together for his funeral.”

“I have no difficulty in understanding how legitimate offence would be caused to the families of the deceased’s victims once it became known that this movement had been played at his cremation,” Sir Geoffrey said.

‘Secretive solicitor’

The judge said Mr Makin could not be “entrusted” with Brady’s ashes because he was “so secretive” about what he intended do with the killer’s remains.

Sir Geoffrey said: “Had he (Mr Makin) discussed the matter openly with the claimants and with Sefton Borough Council and given clear undertakings that he was not intending to scatter the deceased’s ashes in their areas, these proceedings might have been avoided.

“Even now, he has refused to say what he intends to do with the ashes if he is allowed custody of them.”

He said it was unfortunate Sefton Council can no longer arrange dispose of the ashes but he was satisfied that the disposal by an officer of Tameside Council was the “best proposal available”.

Click here to Read from the source


Check Also

The Baftas Need To Try Harder To Shake Their Lacklustre Reputation – HuffPost Verdict

It’s no secret that the Baftas are one of the more lacklustre events on the ...